|
6 registered (JAFFA, ROTOFRYER, SimonS, 3 invisible),
220
Guests and
2
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
9556 Members
35 Forums
40789 Topics
339005 Posts
Max Online: 722 @ 25/01/12 08:25 PM
|
|
|
#81338 - 25/02/02 08:21 PM
Re: Possible Crayfish Solution
|
slimmer
Enthusiastic FW Member
  
Registered: 10/08/01
Posts: 381
Loc: Hertfordshire
|
Point taken lads, but like i said, i'm not looking at total irradication of them, i agree with you Yoda, Kennet (many others too) are infested in area's with em. Point i was trying to make was to 'reduce' them maybe, lighten the problem, i'm sure in time it would have an effect. I'm experiencing problems in 10 feet of water on silt, i thought the little blighters in the main stayed around the marginal area's, near safety, so with the introduction of some chub maybe this would
1: reduce the population
2: keeping them in there safety zone(margins)
Bloddy reggies
And Mark, nowt wrong with the ole Bream!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#81342 - 26/02/02 07:54 PM
Re: Possible Crayfish Solution
|
Outstanding FW Member
  
Registered: 16/09/00
Posts: 532
Loc: Essex
|
Warren,
I was not knocking your suggestion, it is a perfectly valid point, but I do think there are problems associated with it that concern me and although it maybe be possible to control cray fish numbers with chub these other issuess I think need thinking about.
First, it is not generally a good idea to introduce one alien species to control another. Chub are alien in the sense that they are not normally found in lakes (I assume you are talking about lakes or at least enclosed waters). I know that of course chub can and do survive quiet well in lakes, indeed I have caught them in Wraysbury 1, but it is not there natural environment.
Second, you would have to introduce large numbers to have any effect. It would be difficult to get the numbers of the size required and I am sure there would also be problems getting the required permission from the EA.
Third, there is the nusiance problem to carp anglers which should not be underestimated.
Fourth, if the crays are brought under control what would the chub eat then, similar food to the carp most likely and that could have an impact on the carp.
Overall all I am saying is that netting/trapping is a proven method of control and has minimal environmental impact. Introduction of chub is not proven (to my knowledge) and has possible adverse affects.
Just my views, not a dig mate.
Cy.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|