Main Site | Tackle Shop | Search forum archives | Free Membership | FW Members Gallery
Fishingwarehouse 

Chatrooms
 
Who's Online
5 registered (SimonS, VADER, Rocket, 2 invisible), 280 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Shout Box

Newest Members
qciiin, aaronfeng, wlm, Zalmanes, ilikecrisps
9556 Registered Users
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
Top Posters
Paul Selman 11654
Pete B 7772
lancj1 6483
andy jack 6395
Forum Stats
9556 Members
35 Forums
40789 Topics
339005 Posts

Max Online: 722 @ 25/01/12 08:25 PM
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#654 - 17/06/00 07:42 PM Re: Should known recently-stocked foreign carp count as record fish?
the1englishman Offline
Keen FW Member

Registered: 03/06/00
Posts: 38
I think people that go on about fish artificialy stcked fish would be suprised at how many of there own waters have been stocked with foreign fish at one time or another,plus look at all the lakes where big fish have been stocked into other waters from other well know waters.you risk putting yourselves into the stalker minorty type of catagory,there is nothing wrong with this but you are for sure in the minority.and it sadens me to hear how you talk of these fish as imposters and blah blah,,its not the fishes fault and they deserve the same respect we give to out wonderful so called home grown carp..and if the record gets broken by a foreign fish??well get used to it because its going to happen sooner or latter anyway..carp fishing is FIRST AND FORMOST a buisness....do you think this site was set up because they wanted to give something back?no it is set up to someday turn a profit!! we should all stop being so sentimental and wake up and smell the roses,,this is what our sport has become..so all those big names gobbing(wrong choice maybe)off in the press make me laugh.there earning money from the sport just as those that import big foreign fish for paying punters to fish for.. hypocrosy(?) all round i think..

Top
#655 - 18/06/00 08:05 AM Re: Should known recently-stocked foreign carp count as record fish?
Kevin Babij Offline

FW Top Poster
*****

Registered: 15/06/00
Posts: 6004
Loc: Scunny
There are still a number of fisheries left who pride themselves on having "born & bred" stock.
Will these large imported fish be able to reproduce and therefore pass on a heritage or are they just there to satisfy the craving of the "biggest is best" mentality until they eventually turn belly upwards having served no longterm useful purpose,remember that there`s more to a fishery than just providing a hole in the ground full of fish for punters to catch.
Look at Horseshoe;not the biggest carp in Britain by any means but what beauty`s.

[This message has been edited by Kevin Babij (edited 18-06-2000).]


Top
#656 - 18/06/00 10:31 AM Re: Should known recently-stocked foreign carp count as record fish?
cyprio Offline
New FW Member

Registered: 09/06/01
Posts: 56
I agree with most of what is said. There is a difference though, in opinions and practicality. In practise, "average" carp anglers buy the papers every week and see enormous carp paraded by high profile anglers. Nobody comes out and says "this one is a foreign import". Why? Because they would get their arses sued, that's why! If those people wish to pull the wool over other people's eyes, by pretending that these are British fish, then I'm afraid I no longer respect them.

However, that doesn't bother them, because they have people lined up to pay ridiculous prices to fish their waters.

In practical terms then, the whole argument is meaningless. There will come a day when a foreign import will hold the British record, the only question is when.

What really sickens me is that fishery owners, in general (not all, by any means), will accept stock from anywhere, not just abroad, if they feel it will improve thir stock profile. This will inevitably result, some time, in a large fish kill due to introduced parasites/viruses. Fishery owners put it down to experience and buy some more. I just think that anybody who knowingly stocks fish from an unknown source, knowing the potential for death is a brain dead, money grabber who should not be in the sport.


Top
#657 - 19/06/00 10:09 PM Re: Should known recently-stocked foreign carp count as record fish?
Black Knight Offline
Enthusiastic FW Member
***

Registered: 10/06/00
Posts: 279
Loc: Cheshire
quote:
Originally posted by the1englishman:
I think people that go on about fish artificialy stcked fish would be suprised at how many of there own waters have been stocked with foreign fish at one time or another,plus look at all the lakes where big fish have been stocked into other waters from other well know waters.you risk putting yourselves into the stalker minorty type of catagory,there is nothing wrong with this but you are for sure in the minority.and it sadens me to hear how you talk of these fish as imposters and blah blah,,its not the fishes fault and they deserve the same respect we give to out wonderful so called home grown carp..and if the record gets broken by a foreign fish??well get used to it because its going to happen sooner or latter anyway..carp fishing is FIRST AND FORMOST a buisness....do you think this site was set up because they wanted to give something back?no it is set up to someday turn a profit!! we should all stop being so sentimental and wake up and smell the roses,,this is what our sport has become..so all those big names gobbing(wrong choice maybe)off in the press make me laugh.there earning money from the sport just as those that import big foreign fish for paying punters to fish for.. hypocrosy(?) all round i think..

You talk about Carp fishing as a business as though this excuses the existence of the foreign imports. Of course carp fishing is a large and growing industry but that does not mean we should accept the profit motive above all others. I accept that market forces will dictate the pattern of large fish captures in the future; my problem is that there is a large 'black market', unregulated and in danger of damaging the sport for everyone. I neither seek nor want to pay for one of these fish. We should not simply accept this as business, except for the sort of business practice that abandons ethics in favour of a quick buck.


Top
#658 - 19/06/00 11:30 PM Re: Should known recently-stocked foreign carp count as record fish?
Butt Banger Offline
Star FW Member
*****

Registered: 13/06/00
Posts: 1450
Loc: Yorkshire
Black Knight

My opinions on this subject mirror your own.

However, a significant percentage of carp anglers are simply not bothered where the imported 30's ,40's and 50's came from - they just want to fish for and catch them regardless.Their attitude is that they go carping to catch carp so what does it matter where their quarry comes from.A carp is a carp to many and on the back of that ethos foreign imports will continue , fishery owners will get richer and the "a carp is a carp" angler will go home happy when he's caught the newly stocked 50.

I also agree with your ethics/generation comments - but at the end of the day you fish on your own terms - whatever those terms are.

Butt Banger


Top
#659 - 20/06/00 06:59 PM Re: Should known recently-stocked foreign carp count as record fish?
Black Knight Offline
Enthusiastic FW Member
***

Registered: 10/06/00
Posts: 279
Loc: Cheshire
Thanks Butt Banger, I was beginning to feel a little isolated in my views!
You are absolutely right about fishing on your own terms, I certainly know my terms of reference and will stick to them.
Unfortunately, I feel the majic is being lost. I can relate only to my own fishing upbringing. I was raised on a diet of Walker and Redmire and then Hilton, Hutcy, Yates McDonald et al. I feel we have inheritated a wonderful heritage and one I would hope to pass onto my own son when he is old enough to fish. The sad fact is that this heritage is being slowly dismantled by every import and subsequent capture. Perhaps we should form a new carp group dedicated only to genuine English fish. It would succeed too with the patronage of Jenkins, Lane and Hearn. What do you think???????

Top
#660 - 20/06/00 10:06 PM Re: Should known recently-stocked foreign carp count as record fish?
Butt Banger Offline
Star FW Member
*****

Registered: 13/06/00
Posts: 1450
Loc: Yorkshire
Black Knight

You are right - our carp fishing heritage is crumbling and it is driven purely by commercialism right across the board.

I'm off to polish my cane rods and brush down the tweed.

Butt Banger


Top
#661 - 20/06/00 10:57 PM Re: Should known recently-stocked foreign carp count as record fish?
lyn Offline
Enthusiastic FW Member

Registered: 01/06/00
Posts: 112
Loc: Farnham- England
1. It's utter stupidity stocking foreign imports that are not health checked as this could wipe out the original british fish.

2. I would never look on an imported fish as a record any more than I would class a still water barbel as a record.

3. It all back to making money, but if people want to catch a big foreign fish why don't they just go to France and have done with it?

4. On my local club water we have some of the original 'Leney' carp and I would hate to have them put at risk just to have some 'new' (as they originate from Poland some 60 years ago!) foreign monsters stocked there.

We should leave well alone be it carp or cats. Why put what we already have at risk just for the sake of a few pounds.

I feel if the antis don't put a stop to angling then someones greed will!

Before long these mystery virus's that keep wiping out the fish stocks will soon kill them all!


Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2





Copyright © fishingwarehouse.co.uk 1999 - 2009. All rights reserved

Web Hosting by Thai Inter Web Co, Ltd.