|
5 registered (SimonS, VADER, Rocket, 2 invisible),
280
Guests and
5
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
9556 Members
35 Forums
40789 Topics
339005 Posts
Max Online: 722 @ 25/01/12 08:25 PM
|
|
|
#654 - 17/06/00 07:42 PM
Re: Should known recently-stocked foreign carp count as record fish?
|
Keen FW Member
Registered: 03/06/00
Posts: 38
|
I think people that go on about fish artificialy stcked fish would be suprised at how many of there own waters have been stocked with foreign fish at one time or another,plus look at all the lakes where big fish have been stocked into other waters from other well know waters.you risk putting yourselves into the stalker minorty type of catagory,there is nothing wrong with this but you are for sure in the minority.and it sadens me to hear how you talk of these fish as imposters and blah blah,,its not the fishes fault and they deserve the same respect we give to out wonderful so called home grown carp..and if the record gets broken by a foreign fish??well get used to it because its going to happen sooner or latter anyway..carp fishing is FIRST AND FORMOST a buisness....do you think this site was set up because they wanted to give something back?no it is set up to someday turn a profit!! we should all stop being so sentimental and wake up and smell the roses,,this is what our sport has become..so all those big names gobbing(wrong choice maybe)off in the press make me laugh.there earning money from the sport just as those that import big foreign fish for paying punters to fish for.. hypocrosy(?) all round i think..
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#656 - 18/06/00 10:31 AM
Re: Should known recently-stocked foreign carp count as record fish?
|
New FW Member
Registered: 09/06/01
Posts: 56
|
I agree with most of what is said. There is a difference though, in opinions and practicality. In practise, "average" carp anglers buy the papers every week and see enormous carp paraded by high profile anglers. Nobody comes out and says "this one is a foreign import". Why? Because they would get their arses sued, that's why! If those people wish to pull the wool over other people's eyes, by pretending that these are British fish, then I'm afraid I no longer respect them. However, that doesn't bother them, because they have people lined up to pay ridiculous prices to fish their waters. In practical terms then, the whole argument is meaningless. There will come a day when a foreign import will hold the British record, the only question is when. What really sickens me is that fishery owners, in general (not all, by any means), will accept stock from anywhere, not just abroad, if they feel it will improve thir stock profile. This will inevitably result, some time, in a large fish kill due to introduced parasites/viruses. Fishery owners put it down to experience and buy some more. I just think that anybody who knowingly stocks fish from an unknown source, knowing the potential for death is a brain dead, money grabber who should not be in the sport.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#658 - 19/06/00 11:30 PM
Re: Should known recently-stocked foreign carp count as record fish?
|
Star FW Member
   
Registered: 13/06/00
Posts: 1450
Loc: Yorkshire
|
Black Knight My opinions on this subject mirror your own. However, a significant percentage of carp anglers are simply not bothered where the imported 30's ,40's and 50's came from - they just want to fish for and catch them regardless.Their attitude is that they go carping to catch carp so what does it matter where their quarry comes from.A carp is a carp to many and on the back of that ethos foreign imports will continue , fishery owners will get richer and the "a carp is a carp" angler will go home happy when he's caught the newly stocked 50. I also agree with your ethics/generation comments - but at the end of the day you fish on your own terms - whatever those terms are. Butt Banger
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#661 - 20/06/00 10:57 PM
Re: Should known recently-stocked foreign carp count as record fish?
|
Enthusiastic FW Member
Registered: 01/06/00
Posts: 112
Loc: Farnham- England
|
1. It's utter stupidity stocking foreign imports that are not health checked as this could wipe out the original british fish. 2. I would never look on an imported fish as a record any more than I would class a still water barbel as a record. 3. It all back to making money, but if people want to catch a big foreign fish why don't they just go to France and have done with it? 4. On my local club water we have some of the original 'Leney' carp and I would hate to have them put at risk just to have some 'new' (as they originate from Poland some 60 years ago!) foreign monsters stocked there. We should leave well alone be it carp or cats. Why put what we already have at risk just for the sake of a few pounds. I feel if the antis don't put a stop to angling then someones greed will! Before long these mystery virus's that keep wiping out the fish stocks will soon kill them all!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|