So why don't you or In the Mix answer the questions put to you Nick? If you were more open, perhaps the members would be less inclined to have a go at the CS. You would think a publicity officer or spokesman (unpaid) would be an asset, to answer member’s questions and concerns. The CS like to make an issue of money leaving the society in the past though the back door and slagging off the likes of Tim Paisley etc, but money still is leaving, now its called wages and expenses, even though no one knows how much. What’s the difference? Surely you and all other paying members have a fundamental right to know how much?
One of the questions I asked Nick was "Would the Carp Society consider postal voting to ALL its members on ALL major issue’s, like the Building of the Lodge, Splitting Summer Bay Away From the Main Lake, Nominating and Voting for Directors, and any proposals put forward for the AGM". If they honestly had member’s interest at heart and with members all over the country, why can't they answer a simple question like this? They could be the best society/organisation in the country, if only they were more democratic and listened to the membership more, is that to much to ask Nick?
Main Site
|
Previous Topic
Index