|
9 registered (Oldfellah, Pete B, 4 invisible),
211
Guests and
3
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
9554 Members
35 Forums
40789 Topics
339002 Posts
Max Online: 722 @ 25/01/12 08:25 PM
|
|
|
#250006 - 11/03/05 09:19 PM
Re: Why do you want to add Protease to your Base-mix
|
Enthusiastic FW Member
 
Registered: 16/11/03
Posts: 270
|
Quote:
How can you condition a wild animal to accept something it finds repulsive?
In the above mentioned test, by using Serine, it was noticed, Quote: " The carp showed signs of respaitory difficulties, eyes rolling and obvious distress" Explain why you think the tests were flawed...
That's from Kevin Maddocks, right? If so, I'll read the study again tonight and tell you why.
However, the learning of repulsion and attraction occurs during the carp's life. It is unlikely to unlearn what it has learned unless the stimulus is constantly rewarded. The carp probably elicited the above response based on previous experience. To unlearn that would require more education. It highlights the difficulty that is faced in coming up with a universal bait, which is why I always have said such things are impossible. The best we can do is a series of baits that would work better in certain situations...and no, you don't have to tank test some carp from the lake before you fish there! LOL
R
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#250007 - 11/03/05 10:31 PM
Re: Why do you want to add Protease to your Base-mix
|
Outstanding FW Member
 
Registered: 16/07/03
Posts: 462
Loc: Lancashire
|
Sos to step away from the bait issue! But if what roobish is saying about carp learning from previous experiences, then what is ultimately being said is that carp can think and also have the ability to remember substances, flavours, and if it is good or bad for it. This would mean that a carp maintains more than a few minutes memory span and if the memory span is learnt from past experience this would mean that a carp has the ability to think in a much wider way than we thought. It would still be a very primitive thought process, but a thought process all the same. Fish bolt from danger and understand where safety lies for example. This understanding that fish can sometimes think especially when faced with danger has been known by anglers for some time , hence the reasons why thousands of us are convinced that fish can through experience learn from mistakes. But what limits can we place on the carps cognitive learning ability. Sight. fish can see us on the bank and are very aware of our presence, they also have colour vision, and see the world very different from us. The vision of a carp looking out at us can be hindered by reflection very much the same as us trying to look through the reflection of the sky. only the carp sees the reflection of its surroundings. Then we have the lateral line that can detect our movements via vibration. Plus leads hitting the water and maybe even hitting the bottom. One example of fish learning was the scene where Chris Yates places a dummy beside the lake. Fish at first keep away but learn that the figure is harmless, that is at least until Chris takes its place. What I am getting at is that fish do have long term memories, could be why Im blanking at the moment, they recognise me from years ago!!lol. So if this is true which most of us would agree with, then why should a carp not have the capability to decern good bait bad bait dangerous bait safe bait etc. On an higher level I would agree that fish can detect very miniscule amounts of possible food sources via smell, i do not know what ratio to water but I would think it is small. Ok I know that fish are primative in thought process but all the same cognitive thought processes exist. many of us have seen fish eating bait in the wild and there reactions to line, hooked bait etc, and are dumbfounded to see that on many occasions the baited hook is either tried and ejected or completely ignored.? We may conclude from this thread that the carp is a complex fish with the ability to use its brain in a cognitive way, it also can use it in an overt way again only primative but still displays of overt behavior. i cannot speak about my findings on bait additives, but what I can say is that it is possible to enhance a bait that the carp can detect at some distance and that the substances used can be detected by the fish. The other thing I can say is that again a ballance must be made and a wrong substance in a mix will lead to a blank. We must also be aware of what aminos can do if used incorrectly. Remember that acids are ineffect substances that help to start the process of breakdown of bait! Which leads back to the digestive system.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#250010 - 11/03/05 11:20 PM
Re: Why do you want to add Protease to your Base-mix
|
Enthusiastic FW Member
 
Registered: 16/11/03
Posts: 270
|
Quote:
Conclusion
After having spent a whole season using the best of the single or combinations of acids indicated by the tank tests our results were still inconclusive
That was what I remembered he concluded. However, I remember thinking something was very wrong with his tank test, although he did a good job compared to some. I'll re-read it and try and remind myself what it was...
R
Edited by Roobish (11/03/05 11:21 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#250012 - 12/03/05 12:43 AM
Re: Why do you want to add Protease to your Base-mix
|
Enthusiastic FW Member
 
Registered: 16/11/03
Posts: 270
|
Quote:
It was John Lee Hooker and a Bach Oboe concerto....and although that is certainly indicative of a "conditioned reflex" does it equate to "memory"?
I think that is somantic. Whatever you want to call memory or conditioned response, for the sake of argument I claim they are the same thing. The bottom line is you can teach carp things. That requires some ability to repeat a response. Memory or not, you get the idea.
R
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#250013 - 12/03/05 10:53 AM
Re: Why do you want to add Protease to your Base-mix
|
Enthusiastic FW Member

Registered: 25/09/04
Posts: 222
Loc: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
From Dr. Keith Sykes "Chemestry of Chemoreception":
The charactaristics of olfactory stimulating amino acids / primary response:
1) Both x(alpha)Amino and x(alpha) carboxyl groups are essential.
2) The x(aplha)Hydrogen must be free, and preferably the B(beta)Hydrogen.
3) The size of fourth MOIETY is an important factor determining effectivness.
4) L-Isomers are more stimulatory than D-Isomers.
5) Amino Acids are best polar or uncharged.
6) The number of carbon atoms within the amin acid should be between 3 and 5.
7) The addition of a Gydroxy group generally reduces effectivness i.e. Proline > HydroxyProline.
Highly stimulating amino acids:
L-Arginine
X-Amino Butyric Acid +*
x-Amino Caproic Acid +*
x-Amino Valeric Acid +*
L-Citrulline
L-Cysteine
Clycine
L-Histidine
L-Methionine
L-Ornithine
note: + is essential to use x(alpha) forms
note: * These aminos are products of metabolic activities, and not present in natural occurring proteins.
One further point of interest is that most highly stimulatory amino acids have their peak activity between an aqueous pH of 5.0 and 6.0. We can allso note that Iso-electric points of most highly stimulatory amino acids fall within this range.
Secondary response ( taste ):
Arginine, Cystine, Glycine, Glutamic Acid, Histidine*, Iso-leucine, Leucine, Lysine, Methionine*, Phenylalanine, proline, Taurine, Tryptophan, Tyrosine, Valine.
note: * these amino acids not only fulfill a taste response, but allso a primary response and are, finally, essential in carps dietary system. Such amino acids can then be used to very good effect to produce a combination of responses.
Edited by Jesper (12/03/05 10:54 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|